Lesosibirsk, Russian Federation
Lesosibirsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
A variety of natural-production conditions, which is necessary to conduct logging activities largely complicates the choice of forest machines for each individual company in the industry having logging sites in its composition. Depending on many natural and production conditions such as: slope, bearing capacity of soils, ambient temperature, maximum investments, etc., and the wide range of forestry equipment on the market, engineering divisions of the company solving a problem about the purchase of new or replacement of lost its performance machines are more and more difficult to make the right choice. This work presents a methodology for forming the system of forest machines with the natural and production conditions in a convenient form, not requiring special expert knowledge from the field of mathematical modeling or other areas of science. According to the methodology the first step is selection of basic machine and performing the first major operation in felling trees, then switch to the auxiliary machines which are linked to the underlying performance, to reduce the number of in-process stock. Selection of basic and auxiliary machines is provided that candidates and excludes important indicators. If in the process of selecting the logging machine does not meet the screening criteria for excluding indicators then it does not participate in the selection. Significant index can be neglected in case of discrepancy of candidates to stated requirements. The performance of the model was tested on the example of harvesting sites of the enterprises of the Krasnoyarsk region in spring 2016. In the course of the experiment the system of forest machines, meeting the required selection criteria, was obtained.
the method of system selection of forest machines, natural-production conditions, basic machine, auxiliary machine.
1. Bont L. G., Heinimann H. R., Richard L. C. Concurrent optimization of harvesting and road network layouts under steep terrain. Annals of Operations Research, 232, 2012, pp. 41-64.
2. Gerasimov Y., Seliverstov A., Syunev V. Industrial round-wood damage and operational efficiency losses associated with the maintenance of a single-grip harvester head model: a case study in Russia - Forests. 2012, Vol. 3, no. 4. pp. 864-880. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/f3040864
3. Gerasimov Y., Sokolov A., Syunev V. Development trends and future prospects of cut-to-length machinery - Advanced Materials Research. 2013, Vol. 705, pp.468-473. doi:https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.705.468
4. Shegelman I., Budnik P., Morozov E.:Optimization of a forest harvesting set based on the Queueing Theory: Case study from Karelia. Lesn.Cas. For.J., 2015, 61,pp. 211-220.
5. Vinogorov G. K. Nekotorye lesoekspluatatsionnye kharakteristiki pochvenno-gruntovykh usloviy I rel'efa [Some lesoeksportnye characteristics of the soil conditions and terrain].Voprosy tekhnologii I mekhanizatsii lesosechnykh rabot :sbornik nauchnykh trudov TsNIIME [The technology and mechanization of logging operations : collection of scientific works TSNIIME]. Khimki, 1982, pp. 5-7 (In Russian).
6. Kunickaja O.A. Aktual'nye problem lesozagotovitel'nogo proizvodstva v Rossiinarubezhe 2015 goda [Actual problems of timber production in Russia at the turn of 2015] - Aktual'nye napravlenija nauchnyh issledovanij XXI veka:teorijaipraktika [Current research trends of the XXI century: Theory and Practice] 2014, Vol. 2, no. 5-4 (10-4), pp. 183-186.(In Russian).doi:https://doi.org/10.12737/7092
7. Makuev, V.A. Formirovanie parka lesosechnykhmashindlyalesozagotovitel'nogopredpriyatiya [The formation of the Park, logging machinery for logging companies].Moscow, 2004, 184 p (In Russian).
8. Mokhirev A.P., Mokhirev P.F. Kriterii otsenki tekhnologiy lesozagotovitel'nykh proizvodstv [Evaluation criteria of technologies for logging industries] Inženernyjvestnik Dona[Engineering journal of don]. 2015, Vol. 38, no.4 (38), pp. 122.Available at: ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2015/3318.(In Russian).
9. Mokhirev A.P., Mokhirev P.F. Issledovanie spetsifiki lesozagotovok v Krasnoyarskom krae [Study of the specifics of logging in Krasnoyarsk region] Resources and Technology. 2015, Vol. 12, no.2, pp.98-108.(In Russian).doi:https://doi.org/10.15393/j2.art.2015.3061
10. Shegel'man I. R.,Skrypnik V. I., Petukhov R. A. Analiz effektivnosti sortimentnoy zagotovki lesa [Analysis of the effectiveness of CTL logging].UchenyezapiskiPetrGU.Seriya «Estestvennye I tekhnicheskie nauki»[PetrGU's scientific notes.A series of "Natural and technical Sciences"]. 2008, no. 3(94), pp. 94-103(In Russian).
11. Shegel'manI.R., Skrypnik V.I., Kuznetsov A.V. Analiz pokazateley raboty I otsenka effektivnosti lesozagotovitel'nykhmashin v razlichnykhprirodno-proizvodstvennykhusloviyakh [The performance analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of forest machines in different natural production conditions]Uchenyezapiski PetrGU[PetrGU's scientific notes].2010, no.4,pp. 66-75(In Russian).
12. Shekhovtsev D. I. Otsenka prokhodimosti trelevochny khtraktorov [Assessment of the patency of the skidder] Issledovaniyalesopromyshlennykhtraktorov. Trudy TsNIIME[The research problem underlying forestry tractors. WorksTSNIIME]. Khimki, 1982, pp. 14-15 (InRussian).
