Krasnodar, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Key methodological problems, associated with formation and development of the concept of «green" economy, are analyzed. The purpose of the article is to identify the main conceptual approaches, the synthesis of which can create the basis for formation of a single methodological apparatus and implementation of practical actions by local communities in the sphere of "green" economy. As a basis for this, several conceptual approaches have been proposed, including the theory of sustainable development, the theory of "risk society", ecological modernization, the concept of "ecological trace", "environmental space" and ecoefficiency, the theory of the economic identity and the theory of economic development of local communities. The necessity of developing a system of theoretical and methodological principles with a set of operationalized concepts that can synthesize social and environmental interests of local communities with economic and production interests without compromising with natural environment and having a synergistic effect for the sustainable development of regional space is substantiated. The categories of "ecolocus" and "ecological identity" are determined and detailed.
green economy, methodological framework, ecolocus, environmental identity, environmental goods and services, local community.
Одной из важнейших тенденций современного глобального развития является продвижение концепта и практик «зеленой экономики», основой которой выступает теория устойчивого развития. Как известно, устойчивое развитие предполагает гармонизацию развития экономики, социума в целом их природно-экологической основы. Впервые появившись около 30 лет назад, после опубликования доклада Комиссии Брунтланд, теория устойчивого развития не только значительно расширила и углубила свойпонятийный аппарат, получая все новое смысловое наполнение, но и сыграла значительную роль в формировании новых исследовательских подходов и исследовательского инструментария.
1. Bobylev S.N., Zaharov V.M. Modernizatsiya ekonomiki I ustoychivoerazvitie[Modernization of economy and historical development]. M.: Ekonomika, 2011. 295 s.(In Russian).
2. Bochko, V.S. Zelenaya ekonomika: soderzhanie I metodologiya poznaniya[Green economy: content and methodology of understanding].Izvestiya UrGEU [Izvestia of USUE].2016. №3 (65). S. 5-13.(In Russian).
3. Vajczekker, E.H., Lovins, EH.,Lovins, L.Faktor chetyre. Zatrat - polovina, otdacha - dvoynaya. Novyy doklad Rimskomu klubu.[Factor Four: Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use. New report for The Club of Rome].Perevod A. P. Zavarnitsynai V. D. Novikova pod red. akademika G. A. Mesyatsa. M.: Academia, 2000. (In Rus-sian).
4. Porfir'ev, B.N. Ekonomicheskoe izmerenie garmonii cheloveka I prirody [Economic dimension of man and nature harmony].M.: Ankil, 2010.(In Russian).
5. Titov, A.F., Savel'ev, YU.V.,ZHirnel', E.V. Sozdanie ekotekhnologicheskikh klasterov kak sposob preodoleniya protivorechiy mezhdu ekonomikoy I ekologiey [Creation of ecological clusters as a method of overcoming contradictions between economy and ecology]. Materialy XII Obshcheros-siyskogoforuma «Strategicheskoe planirovanie v regionakh I gorodakh Rossii». SPb, 2013.(In Russian).
6. Filippov, Y.V., Avdeeva, T.T. Osnovy razvitiya mestnogo khozyaystva [Basics of local economy develop-ment].M.: Logos, 2011.(In Russian).
7. Baumgartner, RupertJ. ManagingCorporateSustainabilityandCSR: AConceptualFrameworkCombiningValues, Strategiesand Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Develop-ment.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.2014, no. 21, pp. 258-271.
8. Beck, U. Risk Society.Toward a New Modernity. L.: SAGE, 1992, 298 p.
9. Becker, Gary S. Murphy, Kevin M. A theory of Rational Addiction.The Journal of Political Economy, 1988, no.96 (4), pp. 675-700.
10. Jackson, T. Victor, P. Green Economy at Community Scale [Electronic resource]. 2013. Available at: http://metcalffoundation.com/stories/publications/green-economy-at-community-scale/
11. Jackson, T. Victor, P. Productivity and Work in the Green Economy: Some Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Tests. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, pp.101-108.
12. Meadows, Donella H.Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jorgen.Beyond the Limits: Global Colapse or Sustanable Future?L., Earthcan Publications Ltd, 1992.
13. Mol, A.P.J. The Refinement of Production. Ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry. Utrecht: Van Arkel, 1995.
14. Rees, W., Wackernagel, M.Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. Environ. Impact Assess. 1996, rev. 16, pp. 223-248.
15. Toth, G. The truly Responsible Enterprise.Kovet Association for sustainable economies. 2011,120 p.
16. Victor, P., Jackson, T.A commentary on UNEP’s Green Economy scenarios. Ecological Economics. 2012, no. 77, pp. 11-15.
17. Weale, A. The new politics of pollution. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press, 1992.
