Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
The organization of forest management in intact forest landscapes (IFL) is currently an acute and insufficiently methodologically provided problem, which causes numerous discussions and disputes. Siberia is a wide area and heterogeneous in terms of the disturbance of the territory. The use of natural resources on such vast area has its own specifics, which must be taken into account. Intensive forest management, which covers a significant part of boreal forests, leads to a decrease in biodiversity. Evaluation of the structural, component and functional diversity of forest areas showed that not always one source gives complete information (for example, the absence of an indication of the forest type in the background surveys does not allow to determine the ecological-cenotic group (ECG) of the ground cover plants). The forest management project in the intact territory can be represented by a whole complex of elements (accounting of forest use in adjacent territories, study of background disturbances of the landscape, assessment of species and structural plant diversity, organization of «sparing forest use» in the zone of «limited forest use», identification and description of the most valuable sites by unified criteria, organization of an ecological network) that will support biodiversity and the implementation of environmental functions at the level of ecosystems (large forest landscape). The organization of nature management in IFL requires a whole range of knowledge on various issues of landscape design, ecology, geobotany, silviculture, forest inventory, geoinformation systems, etc. To do this, it is necessary to involve a wide range of stakeholders. Only such an approach will allow, on the one hand, to harmonize rational use of natural resources, on the other hand, to maximally preserve natural landscapes in their natural dynamics.
intact forest areas, rational use of natural resources, organization of forest use, biodiversity, forest landscape
Региональные особенности выделения малонарушенных лесных территорий (МЛТ)
В процессе добровольной лесной сертификации на арендованной территории выделяют леса важной природоохранной ценности различной направленности (ЛВПЦ). С точки сохранения естественных экологических систем и природных ландшафтов наиболее значимым является ЛВПЦ 2.
Организация лесопользования в малонарушенных лесных территориях является в настоящее время острой и недостаточно методически обеспеченной проблемой, что вызывает многочисленные дискуссии и споры. Малонарушенные лесные территории относятся к «лесам высокой природо-охранной ценности» второго типа (ЛВПЦ 2). Согласно стандарту FSC [1], это крупные лесные ландшафты, расположенные внутри хозяйственной единицы управления лесами или содержащие ее, в пределах которых могут в естественном состоянии существовать жизнеспособные популяции большинства, если не всех биологических видов, встречающихся на данной территории. К этой категории относят крупные лесные ландшафты, значимые на мировом, национальном и региональном уровнях.
1. FSC-STD-RUS-V6-1-2012 Rossijskij nacional'nyj standart dobrovol'noj lesnoj sertifikacii po skheme lesnogo popechitel'skogo soveta / Russian national standard ENG [Russian national standard for voluntary forest certification according to the scheme of the Forest Stewardship Council] / eds. M. L. Karpachevsky, V. A. Chuprov. - Moscow: Rossijskaya nacional'naya iniciativa LPS Publ., 2008. 141 p.
2. Kartografirovanie potencial'nyh lesov vazhnoj prirodoohrannoj cennosti Priangar'ya. (Poyasnitel'nyj tekst i karta) [Mapping of potential forests of important nature conservation value of the Angara region. (Explanatory text and map)] / A. A. Alejnikov, D. B. Kol'cov, O. V. Smirnova, T. O. Yanickaya. - Moscow: Prozrachnyj mir, 2012. 26 p. (in Russian).
3. Opyt proektirovaniya ehkologicheskoj seti biotopov v zone ehkspluatacionnyh lesov Priangar'ya [Experience in designing an ecological network of biotopes in the area of the exploitation forests of the Angara region] / A. V. Batura, S. K. Farber, V. A. Sokolov, E. V. Fedotova // Hvojnye boreal'noj zony [Coniferous boreal zone]. - 2008. - No. 3. - P. 319-326 (in Russian).
4. Bobrovskij M. V. Kolichestvennaya ocenka raznoobraziya lesnoj rastitel'nosti po lesotaksacionnym dannym [Quantitative assessment of the diversity of forest vegetation by forest taxation data] / M. V. Bobrovskij, L. G. Hanina // Lesovedenie [Forest Science]. - 2004. - №. 3. - P. 28-34 (in Russian).
5. Zaugol'nova L. B. Parametry monitoringa bioraznoobraziya lesov Rossii na federal'nom i regional'nom urovnyah [Parameters of monitoring biodiversity of Russian forests at the federal and regional levels] / L. B. Zaugol'nova, L. G. Hanina // Lesovedenie [Forest Science]. - 2004. - № 3. - P. 3-14 (in Russian).
6. Ivanishcheva, E. A. Landshaftno-biologicheskie obosnovaniya ehkologicheskogo karkasa Severo-Zapada Vologodskoj oblasti: Abstract diss. kand. biol. nauk [Landscape - biological substantiations of the ecological framework of the Northwest of the Vologda region. PhD in biol. sci. abs.]. - Vladimir, 2013. - 18 p. (in Russian).
7. Kriterii i metody formirovaniya ehkologicheskoj seti prirodnyh territorij. Vyp. 1. [Criteria and methods for the formation of an ecological network of natural areas. Edition no. 1]. - Moscow: Centr ohrany prirody Publ., 1999. - 48 p. (in Russian).
8. Metodicheskie podhody i rekomendacii po zonirovaniyu malonarushennyh lesnyh territorij v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge [Methodological approaches and recommendations for zoning of intact forest areas in the Siberian Federal District]. - Moscow: Vsemirnyj fond dikoj prirody (WWF) Publ., 2017. - 45 p. (in Russian).
9. Yanickaya T. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po vydeleniyu LVPC [Practical guidance on the allocation of HCVF] / T. Yanickaya. - Moscow: Vsemirnyj fond prirody (WWF) Publ., 2008. - 136 p. (in Russian).
10. Yaroshenko A. S. Malonarushennye lesnye territorii Evropejskogo Severa Rossii [Uninhabited forest territories of the European North of Russia] / A. S. Yaroshenko, P. V. Potapov, S. A. Turubanova. - Moscow: Grinpis Publ., 2001. - 75 p. (in Russian).
11. Woodland Key Habitat Inventory in Estonia 1999-2002 [Text] / L. Andersson, R. Martverk, M. Klvik, A. Palo, A. Varblane // Regio Publishing. - Tartu, 2003. - 112 r.
12. Ciccarese L. Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead [Text] / L. Ciccarese, A. Mattsson, D. Pettenella // New Forests, 2012. - Vol. 43. - No 5-6. - P. 543-560.
13. Feld C. K. Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales [Text] / C. K. Feld // Oikos. - 2009. - Vol. 118. - No 12. - P. 1862-1871.
14. Sourcebook on remote sensing and biodiversity indicators [Text] / H. Strand, R. Hoft, J. Strittholt, L. Miles, N. Horning, E. Fosnight, W. Turner // Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Technical Series, 2007. - No 32. - P. 203.
