ABOVE-GROUND PHYTOMASS OF APPLE TREES GROWN IN PROSTRATE SHRUB FORM IN THE SUBURBAN AREA OF KRASNOYARSK
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article presents the results of studies of the aboveground phytomass of domestic apple (Malus domestica Borkh) at 14-year and 113-year biological age, which were carried out on the basis of Krutovsky Botanical Garden in the suburban area of Krasnoyarsk. The features of phytomass distribution by fractional composition have been established for the first time for apple trees grown in Siberia in prostrate shrub form. From 10 to 13 leaves with an average area of 26 cm2 and an absolutely dry weight of 0.34 g are formed on the annual shoots of prostrate shrub apple trees. During the formation of fruit trees in the form of "Krasnoyarsk prostrate shrub", three or four main skeletal branches are left. The average model branch of a 14-year-old tree has a length of 3.4 m and a diameter of 7.6 cm at the point of attachment to the trunk; its weight is 1.4 kg in an absolutely dry state. The aboveground phytomass of a tree is 9.7 kg (on average) in an absolutely dry state. At the same time, leaves account for 12% of the aboveground phytomass, stem - 16.6%, branches - 71.4%. With regular pruning of the crown to maintain the prostrate shrub form of cultivation in Krutovsky Botanical Garden, by the age of 14, the phytomass of the crown decreases by 30-33%. The average model branch in a 113-year-old apple tree, when grown in prostrate shrub form, has a length of 6.4 m and a diameter at the base of 26.7 cm. Its weight in an absolutely dry state is 51.9 kg. The phytomass of the aboveground part of a 113-year-old apple tree averages 164 kg in an absolutely dry state, being distributed by fractions: 1.8% (leaves), 3.4% (stem) and 94.8% (branches), respectively

Keywords:
aboveground phytomass, apple tree, biodiversity, variability, prostrate shrub form
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Atkina, L. I. Osobennosti formirovaniya nadzemnoy fitomassy boyaryshnika krovavo-krasnogo, yabloni yagodnoy, ryabiny obyknovennoy i klena yasenelistnogo v usloviyah g. Ekaterinburga / L. I. Atkina, M. V. Ignatova // Lesa Rossii i hozyaystvo v nih. - Ekaterinburg: UGLTU, 2009. - № 3(34). - S. 53-59. - ISSN 2218-7545

2. Vasfilov, S. P. Analiz prichin izmenchivosti otnosheniya suhoy massy lista k ego ploschadi u rasteniy / S. P. Vasfilov // Zhurnal obschey biologii, 2011. - T. 72, № 6. - S. 436-454. - ISSN 0044-4596

3. Ignatova, M. V. Osobennosti formirovaniya nadzemnoy fitomassy boyaryshnika krovavo-krasnogo, yabloni yagodnoy, ryabiny obyknovennoy i klena yasenelistnogo v usloviyah g. Ekaterinburga: dis. ... kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.03.03: zaschischena 28.04.2011 / M. V. Ignatova; Ekaterinburg: UGLTU, 2011. - 130 s.

4. Matveeva, R. N. Selekciya yabloni v Botanicheskom sadu im. Vs.M. Krutovskogo / R. N. Matveeva, O. F. Butorova, N. V. Moksina, M. V. Repyah. - Krasnoyarsk: SibGTU, 2006. - 357 s. - ISBN-5-8173-0264-4

5. Rachenko, M. A. Osobennosti rosta i plodonosheniya krupnoplodnyh sortov yabloni v usloviyah Yuzhnogo Predbaykal'ya / M. A. Rachenko, E. I. Rachenko // Vestnik IRGSHA, 2012. - № 52. - S. 52-56. - ISSN 1999-3765

6. Usol'cev, V. A. Vertikal'no-frakcionnaya struktura fitomassy derev'ev. Issledovanie zakonomernostey. / V. A. Usol'cev - Ekaterinburg: UGLTU, 2013. - 608 s. - ISBN 978-5-94984-439-7

7. Usol'cev, V. A. Biologicheskaya produktivnost' lesov Urala v usloviyah tehnogennogo zagryazneniya: Issledovanie sistemy svyazey i zakonomernostey. / V. A. Usol'cev, E. L. Vorobeychik, I. E. Bergman. - Ekaterinburg: UGLTU, 2012. - 366 s. - ISBN 978-5-94984-405-2

8. Usol'cev, V. A. Metody taksacii fitomassy derev'ev: uchebno-metodicheskaya razrabotka. / V. A. Usol'cev, Z. Ya. Nagimov. - Sverdlovsk: ULTI, 1988. - 46 s.

9. Yakushev, V. I. Plodovodstvo s osnovami dekorativnogo sadovodstva. / V. I. Yakushev, V. V. Shevchenko. - M.: Kolos, 1980. - 270 s.

10. Biomass functions for the two alien tree species Prunus serotina Ehrh. and Robinia pseudoacacia L. in fl oodplain forests of Northern Italy / P. Annighöfer, I. Mölder, S. Zerbe, H. Kawaletz, A. Terwei, C. Ammer // European Journal of Forest Research. - 2012. - Vol. 131. - P. 1619-1635. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0629-2.

11. Intraspecific variability of apple tree by indicators of vegetative and generative organs / N. P. Bratilova, N. V. Moksina, O. A. Gerasimova // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. - 2019. - Vol. 316. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/316/1/012012.

12. Variability of summer apple tree varieties in 2019 by indicators of vegetative organs / N. P. Bratilova, O. A. Gerasimova // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. - 2019. - Vol. 421. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/421/8/082008.

13. Determination of Biomass Energy Equivalent of Apple Malus communis L in Kayseri Province / N. Cetin, C. Saglam, B. Demir // 1st International Congress on Biosistem Engineering (ICOBEN2019). - 2019. - P. 238-241

14. Leaf area estimation in some species of fruit tree by using models as a non-destructive method / H. Demirsoy // Fruits. - 2009. - Vol. 64 (1) - P. 45-51. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2008049.

15. Short communication. Validation of a leaf area estimation model for sweet cherry/ H. Demirsoy, G. A. Lang // Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. - 2010. - 8 (3) - P. 830-832. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010083-1285

16. How does biomass allocation change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from fi ve continents / H. Poorter, A. M. Jagodzinski, R. Ruiz-Peinado, S. Kuyah, Y. Luo, J. Oleksyn, V. A. Usoltsev, T. N. Buckley, P. B. Reich, L. Sack // New Phytologist. - 2015. - Vol. 208. - Issue 3. - P. 736-749. DOI: 10.1111/ nph.13571/epdf.

17. A simple and non-destructive model for individual leaf area estimation in citrus/ R. B. Mazzini, R. V. Ribeiro, R. M. Pio // Fruits. - 2010. - Vol. 65 (5). - P. 269-275. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2010022.

18. «Diminishing returns» in the scaling of functional leaf traits across and within species groups/ K. J. Niklas, E. D. Cobb, Ü. Niinemets, P. B. Reich, A. A. Sellin, B. Shipley, I. J. Wright // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. - 2007. - Vol. 104. - P. 8891-8896. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701135104.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?