UDK 33 Экономика. Экономические науки
One of the main internal challenges that hinder the sustainable development of Russia's regions and the transition of its economy to a new technological order is territorial social and economic differentiation. The article analyzes methodological approaches to assessing the territorial differentiation of the social and economic system of regions and municipalities. The main approaches presented in the social and economic literature have been revealed. The assessment methods used by domestic and foreign scientists are presented and critically analyzed. It is revealed that among the authors of scientific works there is still no consensus not only on the theoretical aspects, but also on the methodological issues of the procedure for assessing territorial differentiation. The systematization of the approaches and tools used by scientists from different countries has been carried out. The advantages, disadvantages and limitations for the practical application of the selected methodological approaches have been indicated. It is shown that each of the presented approaches is a basic principle when conducting territorial differentiation. Depending on the tasks set, the choice of methodological assessment approaches may vary. Clarification of existing and development of new methods for assessing sustainable socio-economic development of municipalities is the first step in creating targeted programmes to equalize territorial disparities of development in Russia.
differentiation, social and economic development, region, methodological approach
ВВЕДЕНИЕ
Актуальность выбранной темы исследования обусловлена тем, что устойчивое развитие любого региона определяется территориальной дифференциацией социально-экономического развития ее внутренних территорий. Для этого необходима постоянная диагностика мезоэкономической среды с целью определения структурных диспропорций в развитии асимметрии отдельных территорий и муниципалитетов. Для решения проблемы оценки уровня дифференциации в социально-экономическом развитии территорий необходим специальный методический инструментарий, который позволил бы дать адекватную оценку чрезмерной дифференциации и предложить меры управленческого решения по ее нивелированию.
ЦЕЛЬ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
Анализ методических подходов к оценке территориальной дифференциации социально-экономической системы регионов и муниципалитетов.
Методы ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
Для реализации рассмотрения предложенной цели исследования были использованы методы анализа, сравнения, обобщения и систематизации.
1. Baranov, S.V. Novye metodiki i rezul'taty issledovaniya mezhregional'noy differenciacii na osnove metoda glavnyh komponentov/ S.V. Baranov, T.P. Skuf'ina // Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta. -2008. -T. 11. -No 2. S. 201-210.
2. Granberg, A. G. Osnovy regional'noy ekonomiki: uchebnik dlya vuzov. - M.: GUVShE, 2000. S. 495.
3. Granberg, A.G. Ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo Rossii: vechnye problemy, transformacionnye processy, poisk strategiy/ A.G. Granberg//Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii: periodicheskoe nauchnoe izdanie. -2004. -No1.- S.16-22.
4. Kuznecova, I.I. Problema territorial'noy differenciacii v regional'noy ekonomike i vozmozhnosti ee issledovaniya na gorodskom urovne/ I.I. Kuznecova//Trudy ISA RAN. -2006. -T. 22.- S. 261-268.
5. Lavrovskiy, B.L. K voprosu o metodologii i tehnike regional'noy klassifikacii/ B.L. Lavrovskiy, V.V. Masakov //Regional'naya politika, napravlennaya na sokrascheniya social'no-ekonomicheskoy i pravovoy asimmetrii: Sb. trudov /Pod. Red. V.E. Seliverstova. - Novosibirsk, 2000.- Vyp. 2. -S. 65-86.
6. Leksin, V. Obscherossiyskie reformy i territorial'noe razvitie. Stat'ya 2. Reformy i celostnost' gosudarstva. Problemy territorial'noy differenciacii i dezintegracii / V. Leksin, A. Shvecov // REZh. - 1999. - No 11-12. - S. 36-44.
7. Minakir, P.A. Mnimye i real'nye disproporcii ekonomicheskogo prostranstva / P.A. Minakir // Prostranstvennaya ekonomika. - 2008. - No 4. - S. 5-18.
8. Popov, P.A. Definicii social'no-ekonomicheskoy asimmetrii municipal'nyh organizaciy regiona /P.A. Popov // Social'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i processy. - 2010. - No 5. - S. 85-88.
9. Samarina, V.P. Osobennosti ocenki neravnomernosti social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov/ V.P. Samarina // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki. 2008.No1. S. 300-303.
10. Ten, R. Metodicheskie podhody k izucheniyu social'no-ekonomicheskoy differenciacii regionov/R. Ten//Ezhegodnaya nauchnaya sessiya studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov kafedry social'no-ekonomicheskoy geografii i regionovedeniya: materialy dokladov 19 apr. 2017 g., g. Voronezh/otv. Red. N.V. Yakovenko, VGU. - Voronezh: VGPU, 2017. - S. 154-156.
11. Treschevskiy Yu.I. Teoretiko-metodicheskoe obosnovanie mehanizma upravleniya regionami Rossii v usloviyah asinhronnosti ih razvitiya/ Yu. I. Treschevskiy, A. I. Schedrov // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: ekonomika i upravlenie. -2011. -№2.- S. 104-113.
12. Yakovenko, N.V. Depressivnye regiony Rossii: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika/N.V. Yakovenko. - Ivanovo: GUP IO «Ivanovskiy izdatel'skiy dom», 2013. - 205 s.
13. Yakovenko, N.V. Strategicheskaya konkurentosposobnost' regiona: teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya /N.V. Yakovenko, I.V. Komov, O.V. Didenko//Nauka Krasnoyar'ya. - 2017. -T. 6. № 1-3. -S. 93-96.
14. Bulkina, A. Investigation of Correlation between the Regions Sustainability and Territorial Differentiation /V. Glinskiy, L. Serga, A. Novikov, G. Litvintseva, A. Bulkina //Procedia Manufacturing. -2017. -No 8. -P. 323-329.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.041.
15. Firescu, V., Popescu, J. 2015. The Costs of Quality: An Important Decision Tool. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(4), 44-52.
16. Frank, V.E., Mashevskaya, V. O., Ermolina, V.L. 2016. Innovational Mechanism of Implementation of Cluster Initiatives in Business. European Research Studies Journal,19(1), 179-188.
17. Kline, P. and Moretti, E. (2016) “People, places and public policy: some simple welfare economics of local economic development policies”. American Review of Economic 6: 629-66.
18. Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, T. (2017) Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies, 51:1, 46-57, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1158802
